|
I shouldn't even dignify that with a response... However...
I'm not even going to START with who is the real armotech I'll just let this little story speak for itself.
Shortly after I got my SIM-4 I was at my field store (Fox River Games) looking to get an allen wrench tool for it. I wasn't sure if it was metric or standard so I had to bring it in to see. Before I even got it to the counter, the guys at the store burst out laughing. "YOU GOT AN ARMOTECH! Oh man, what a sap. Those guns are complete crap! They're just spyders with body kits on it and they're like 90% plastic"
Well when I actually got to the counter with it and showed it to them, low and behold EVERYONE wants to hold it! Oh look it's not mostly plastic! Oh look it's durable & well constructed. "Yeah but how does it fire?" Well all I had to do was take it out back with them and they were sold. The store is considering carrying SIM-4's now because they were so impressed with mine.
On top of that, there are quite a few good reviews for the SIM-4 out there from satisfied customers (me for one). I've YET to see a single review of the WG-65 either way. All I ever get from the people who use them is flames towards the SIM-4. Why don't you guys stop flaming us and start defending your own gun instead.
I love my SIM-4 and I won't stand for people calling it a cheap ripoff. If it is indeed a cheap ripoff then I find it's ironic that the ripoff surpassed the original in quality.
Finally I noticed you called armotech.net a ripoff site. You might be interested to know that not only does .net sell the WG series (not the SIM series), but that they are associated with .us.
I'm not going to say armotech.com is the original since I don't have the facts pertaining to that. However, I think YOU should get your facts straight before you going flaming and toss out incorrect information.
|