Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sumsimpleracer
Andrew, i simply copy and pasted from google results, please don't flame, lately i've lacked the time to ask why and ask for proof to some of these claims. work rules my summer
|
Don't worry, I'm not flaming you. I just want to make it clear that you should always question really far-fetched ideas like this.
But, it should also be made clear that just because something is outlandish doesn't mean you should instantly think "This is bull****". People used to believe that maggots just magically appeared in rotting flesh (
Abiogenesis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia) and that the world was the center of the universe and surrounded by various spheres that carried the stars and planets (
Geocentric model - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia). When someone suggested that life comes from other life, and that the earth revolves around the sun, these new "outlandish" ideas were met with harsh opposition. Fortunately, the scientists who proposed them offered evidence and they were eventually accepted by the scientific community.
This is where the difference lays- the theories you proposed aren't backed by much, if any, evidence. Copernicus backed his "crazy" idea up with evidence (the movement of planets, math, etc). These theories you found base themselves on a very remote possibility (See: Yellowstone Super Volcano), and are only talked about because of mankind's obsession with doomsday.
I'll quit ranting- but basically if someone comes up to you with a crazy idea, before you walk away, ask if they have evidence. If they claim to, hear them out. It's probably bull**** evidence, but it's still good to keep an open mind.