he isnt anti-gay. Catholics are anti-gay MARRIAGE.MedicDVG said:Ratzinger has been running the day to day opeartions of the vatican for some time now. He is an ultra conservative man who is anti-women, anti-gay, anti-american. So this should be fun -- don't be surprised to see an "American" Catholic Church succeed from the "Roman" catholic church.
dhill0413 said:he isnt anti-gay. Catholics are anti-gay MARRIAGE.
So if I'm against a construction worker working as a doctor does that mean I'm anti construction worker? No, it doesn't. It just means I don't think a person that isn't qualified to do something should do it. It's the same thing with people against gay marriage. Marriage started out as a religious joining of a man and a woman, having a man and a man or woman and woman get 'married' is an attack on the religion. It's no different than a person going into a muslimi mosque naked and swearing or a guy dressed up as hitler going into a synagogue.toXic said:That is basically the same thing. Whats the difference if they are married or not? If you dont want them to get married, you probably dont want them to be together anyway. So in my opinion if your ANTI-gay marrage, then your anti-gay.
And yes, i am anti-gay.
Why shouldn't Gays be allowed to married? They're not looking for special treatment, they're just looking to be included in the status quo.dhill0413 said:Well while i am anti-gay marriage, im not fully anti-civil union. Though i dont support gay culture or anything, im a realist and civil unions are something that wouldnt be terribly bad for the economy or anything.
When it comes to marriage that is a sacred bond that results in creating familes.
And it's a very economically viable thing. I think we should allow gay marrige simply because it's wrong to not lett hem get the same tax breaks as straight people. I see nothing "immoral" with thatdhill0413 said:When it comes to marriage that is a sacred bond that results in creating familes.